It is a matter of perspectives. Christians, Muslims and Jews (others), advertise
that they are standing on the ‘Moral High Ground’ and use that as the
leveraging point to assail atheists and others not of their religious persuasion. When given the feedback that they have failed
to prove a point, establish a solid position, or are just plain wrong they
respond harshly and with strong negative emotion.
I always found it interesting that those who call
themselves ‘religious’ or ‘faithful’ cannot be wrong or in error in some manner. The perception of infallibility is well
entrenched in the process of indoctrination of the converts and factions. The perspective is well endowed with logical
fallacies, failed reasoning, and a profound lack of self-examination. Behaviorally speaking, whether portrayed as a
cult, addiction, disease, or gang religious affiliation and the corresponding
faith attributed has a central theme ‘god first’. The faithful must protect the religion at all
cost. If an atheist introduces doubt it
shakes the foundation and creates an existential crisis for the believer. This crisis is so profound that it rattles
the underpinnings for the believer.
These kinds of processes are akin to the feelings of fight, flight or
freeze responses when one’s life is in jeopardy.
Examination of basic behavioral principles applied to
Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs. Tying each
of the levels to some feature of the religious practice:
The foundation of the pyramid are well described in most
religious texts as to the; who, what, when, how and the where. Many religious organizations offer, food,
water, and a place to sleep if the person is not able to provide for self. Given
the person’s participation in the eating, drinking, sleeping and other basic
physiological needs the religious organization only asks that the participant then
pray or worship with them. This is the
beginning of the indoctrination, the underpinnings if you will the
brain-washing using the basic human needs to entice the participant into the
organization.
If the individuals basic human needs are met then safety
and security are used as a tool to entice the participant into the religious
organization. They offer security of the
individual. Organizations sometimes an
offer of stable income, establishment of a set of moral standards that the
person finds appealing, establishing a strong sense of safety and stability;
written in the religious texts and applied by the faithful. This is a very strong motivator for those who
have experienced trauma. Religious aid
groups offer support and guidance to individuals who have suffered from natural
disasters. Most if not all have some way
of communicating that the ‘religion’ is responsible for the care and comfort of
those suffering.
If an individual’s physiological needs, safety and
security are met the religion also offers love and belonging. One is always greeted with a smile at a
church and a hearty welcome. A great way
to advertise: “You are welcome here.” They
offer coffee or conversation after the sermon, and social groups associated
with the religion, some are secret – requiring an invitation. Some require a special handshake lending a
lot of secrecy and enhanced inclusiveness.
The religion continues to work all avenues of the pyramid
to offer something of reinforcement to the believer. The holy book comes packed with all kinds of
morals, lessons, and tools. The sermons
come filled with self-esteem boosting, and many religious leaders recognize
parishioners during the sermon to point out achievement. There are awards that are given for differing
levels of accomplishment. These are frequently
offered (if not always) in front of the audience advertising advancement in the
religious practices. It fills the person
with pride and inspiration to do more.
At the top of the pyramid is self-actualization. Goals set here by the individual include
becoming a teacher of religious doctrine and becoming a leader of the faithful. There are some issues with abuse of power and
influence at the top of the pyramid.
This is best left for a different post.
Atheists chipping away at any one of these parts of the
pyramid demonstrating a believers responding to basic classical (or operant) conditioning
perspectives tend to elicit a strong response as an argument on the person directly
due to the nature of the conditioning that has taken place.
The same human needs are applied to atheism as well. This
can be tempered with intelligence and forethought when approaching the needs of
humans. Ego and self-importance are not
what atheism is about. It is the
rejection of a god. The rejection that
the only correct way of thinking is a religious way of thinking, any
implication to the contrary is horrendously flawed.
The faithful do not understand the influences acting on
them. They feel that they are standing
on the top of the pyramid looking down upon all others. This is an illusion conditioned over time. They are just as susceptible to all human
(animal) conditioning.
No comments:
Post a Comment